From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jul 16 0:53:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF14A37B5D1; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 00:53:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA74563; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 01:53:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id BAA52125; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 01:52:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200007160752.BAA52125@harmony.village.org> To: Kelly Yancey Subject: Re: SysctlFS Cc: Julian Elischer , Robert Watson , Dan Nelson , Adrian Chadd , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2000 00:49:43 PDT." References: Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 01:52:55 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Kelly Yancey writes: : I didn't mean when you mounted the jail, but rather when you mounted the : filesystem in question (i.e. /dev or /proc). The mount flag would be used to : indicate that is mount is to transcend jails. In other words, when building a : list of the current mount points inside a jail, mount with this flag would : always be included. It is arguably a hack, but I don't see why it wouldn't : work. You certainly don't want to do that for /dev in jails. The whole point of jails is that you can give them access to a small subset of devices that are "safe". Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message