From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Sep 26 13:29:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA15032 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:29:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt053nb4.san.rr.com (dt053nb4.san.rr.com [204.210.34.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA15027 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:28:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt053nb4.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA06296 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:28:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <360D4E83.8B656BC9@dal.net> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:28:51 -0700 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE-0920 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Subject: COMPAT_43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm curious as to whether/how much the COMPAT_43 option is still needed in a modern system. Before someone says, "Why don't you take it out and find out for yourself?" I would be glad to do that and report the results (after the release of course) if someone could state with reasonable assurance that most things would still work. :) Thanks, Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message