From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  8 07:27:46 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69B716A41F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Sep 2005 07:27:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from erik.winge@gmail.com)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376BA43D45
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Sep 2005 07:27:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from erik.winge@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1549940wra
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=Qf3Du6Q6M/ejdiMmj95VVFakmxsa78CJQ/8aXC4Rla4DNwCxJRU9BMtsIQvgmsDS9qIv0rMUNKUeXQQmFPBeIcA57K4wYp7tGX6JuyrotQ3TqMSVnd0lPnmHeVNa9sxRP/pF0z/lX1erzBXsMsANDnPVgGrpFlwgC6KdP40D/kI=
Received: by 10.54.104.11 with SMTP id b11mr5269377wrc;
	Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.80.20 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 00:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4cf221cc05090800277c0d61b2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:27:45 +0200
From: Erik Winge <erik.winge@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <4cf221cc050907095139f6058b@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4cf221cc050718035328cfb071@mail.gmail.com>
	<05Jul18.130434cest.118130@fd.hif.hu>
	<4cf221cc05090613208a72a08@mail.gmail.com>
	<2300.193.68.33.1.1126075625.squirrel@193.68.33.1>
	<4cf221cc050907095139f6058b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: if_ural in 6.0-BETA4/7.0-CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:27:46 -0000

Hi,

On 9/7/05, Erik Winge <erik.winge@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/7/05, =C1d=E1m Szilveszter <adamsz@mailpont.hu> wrote:
> > I no longer see this problem on a 7.0-CURRENT box with a kernel+ world
> > from 26th August. I can leave the box up for a day and idle for hours, =
the
> > connection stays. I still use the ral(4) cards referenced in the quote.
> >
> > Perhaps something missing from 6.0-BETA?
>=20
> As far as I can tell, if_ural.c in RELENG_6 is now up-to-date with
> 7.0-CURRENT. Perhaps this means the fault lies somewhere else?
>=20
> I guess perhaps i should give 7.0-CURRENT a try.

Ok, I have updated to 7.0-CURRENT, and still have this problem.
Perhaps it has been fixed in ral, but not in ural? I'm a bit confused
:)

Regards,
Erik Winge