From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 5 11:21:26 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA24800 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 11:21:26 -0700 Received: from bigdipper.umd.edu (bigdipper.umd.edu [128.8.220.139]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA24794 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 11:21:24 -0700 Received: (from adhir@localhost) by bigdipper.umd.edu (8.6.8/8.6.6) id NAA06923; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 13:45:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 13:45:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alok K. Dhir" To: Matt Thomas cc: Michael Vernick , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PCI/EISA/ISA performance In-Reply-To: <199504041833.SAA10697@whydos.lkg.dec.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have been unable to find a 100 mbit hub so far - how is one supposed to take advantage of these 100mbit cards w/o a 100mbit hub? Thanks... On Tue, 4 Apr 1995, Matt Thomas wrote: > > Anyone have any performance results comparing the three types of > > buses? I'm interested in disk I/O performance and/or network > > I/O performance using the three buses and DMA. > > As a rule of thumb, PCI > EISA > ISA. > > > Also, someone mentioned that the DEC DE500-XA network card is being > > supported. Is it a PCI 100Mb/Sec card? > > It is. Just about 10 minutes ago I got > > de1 rev 17 int a irq 15 on pci0:8 > reg20: virtual=0xf1d05100 physical=0x20000100 size=0x80 > de1: enabling 10baseT UTP port > de1: DC21140 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.1 ethernet address 08:00:2b:e1:06:07 > > to work. > -------------------------------------___--------------------------------- | Al Dhir, Programmer Analyst /___\ UMCP Ag-Engineering Dept | | Internet: adhir@bigdipper.umd.edu (o o) (301) 405-1197 | ---------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-----------------------------