Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:13:50 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE Message-ID: <20160711201350.GF20831@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <c670eadd-05f6-7332-afa6-8867c4f57eef@freebsd.org> References: <20160710133019.GD20831@zxy.spb.ru> <f35c1806-c06d-0d46-1c8a-58a56adef9a7@freebsd.org> <20160710150143.GK46309@zxy.spb.ru> <cb12083d-445a-ea19-5538-d670a89fcc6d@freebsd.org> <9ead7cd7-7d1b-2dd8-eea8-43f7766d92a9@freebsd.org> <d4329543-0503-cfc0-eb17-378d561d4c0f@freebsd.org> <20160711102906.GN46309@zxy.spb.ru> <1468253073.695754.662984777.1E8F9C28@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160711162902.GO46309@zxy.spb.ru> <c670eadd-05f6-7332-afa6-8867c4f57eef@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:48:44PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> > >>> I.e. GOST will be available in openssl. > >>> Under BSD-like license. > >>> Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0? > >>> And can be GOST enabled now? > >>> > >> > >> I think the wrong question is being asked here. Instead we need to focus > >> on decoupling openssl from base so this can all be handled by ports. > > > > This is wrong direction with current policy. > > ports: unsupported by FreeBSD core and securite team, no guaranted to comaptible > > between options and applications. > > > > base: supported by FreeBSD core and securite team, covered by CI, > > checked for forward and backward API and ABI compatibility. > > > > Ports are supported by secteam, and recently I notice "headsup" mail > with intention to make base openssl private and switch all ports to > security/openssl port. I mean `support` is commit reviewing, auditing and etc. Secteam do it for ports? > Adding of GOST as 3rd party plugin is technically possible in both > (base, ports) cases, the rest of decision is up to FreeBSD openssl > maintainers and possible contributors efforts. > > I need to specially point to "patches" section of the 3rd party GOST > plugin, from just viewing I don't understand, are those additional > openssl patches should be applied to openssl for GOST, or they are just > reflect existent changes in the openssl. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160711201350.GF20831>