Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:27:57 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/88291: [update] devel/smc: UNBREAK port (size mismatch) Message-ID: <52412306@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <200510312006.j9VK6pRw034243@freefall.freebsd.org> (Kirill Ponomarew's message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:06:51 GMT") References: <200510312006.j9VK6pRw034243@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:06:51 GMT Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > The patch is trivial, but what is changed in tarball and why it was > rerolled 4 5 6 7 Can you provide this info 4 5 6 7 You see, I'm only reading the message at FreeBSD-ports@ list... ----- From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken ----- ... and trying to do my best to unbreak some of the ports. Hence, I don't use the port. Nevertheless I did all recommended steps to check that patch. If you say that the info you asked is vital, I'll try to get in touch with the developers. But according to http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=8964 the sources weren't touch since 2005-09-19 08:41. And sorry, I didn't catch what does "4 5 6 7" mean? Is it a secret password? ;-) 7 8 9 10 WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52412306>