From owner-freebsd-security Thu Oct 22 12:03:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09972 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:03:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt053nb4.san.rr.com (dt053nb4.san.rr.com [204.210.34.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA09966 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt053nb4.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA03792; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:02:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@gorean.org) Message-ID: <362F8148.D178BA79@gorean.org> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:02:32 -0700 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE-1015 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Deepwell Internet CC: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FrontPage Server Extensions References: <4.1.0.67.19981022093228.009d4450@mail1.dcomm.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Deepwell Internet wrote: > I've been seriously thinking about installing the frontpage extensions, but > I'm a little weary since this is a Stronghold secure webserver. People > around the office have been saying that the FP extensions are insecure and > buggy, but no one can point to any real examples. A good friend and sometime customer of mine who makes his living as one of the most successful NT ISV's has nothing but bad things to say about FPE. His exact words aren't printable in a family newspaper. :) YMMV. Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** Go PADRES! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message