Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:44:03 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Anthony Jenkins <scoobi_doo@yahoo.com> Cc: "wireless@freebsd.org" <wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Atheros AR9565 detected, not working Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokXWLn7m=tPhxG=on6HbF%2BeX1hODQETRqWorzqf6gE1cw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=rLMaatYY692fzc2CF2iiEXM9Fd5DZZpJTWOD_6mHpQg@mail.gmail.com> References: <1156584761.958533.1418932395342.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10611.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <CAJ-Vmo=rLMaatYY692fzc2CF2iiEXM9Fd5DZZpJTWOD_6mHpQg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oh, and ath_hal_enable_rfkill() maps to setting the capability bit:
#define ath_hal_enable_rfkill(_ah, _v) \
ath_hal_setcapability(_ah, HAL_CAP_RFSILENT, 1, _v, AH_NULL)
.. so, the AR9300 HAL code is enabling RFKILL in the HAL and then the
call to ar9300_enable_rf_kill() is unconditionally turning it on. We
likely can't do that for everyone.
So, I wonder why this is required for you!
-adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokXWLn7m=tPhxG=on6HbF%2BeX1hODQETRqWorzqf6gE1cw>