From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 18:00:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F333916A400 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848E643D45 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:00:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3CI0Y93080012 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:00:34 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3CI0Yh0080011; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:00:34 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:00:34 GMT Message-Id: <200604121800.k3CI0Yh0080011@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: conf/95634: sendmail configuration isn't updated after 8.13.4 to 8.13.6 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:00:35 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/95634; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Rostislav Krasny Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/95634: sendmail configuration isn't updated after 8.13.4 to 8.13.6 update Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:51:20 +0300 On 2006-04-11 19:27, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > After one of system upgrades those I do wheekly I noticed that > sendmail is updated but its configuration isn't. When I reran a > mergemaster I saw following lines in its output: > > *** Temp ./etc/mail/freebsd.mc and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/freebsd.cf and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/freebsd.submit.mc and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/freebsd.submit.cf and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/helpfile and installed are the same, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/sendmail.cf and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/submit.cf and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/Makefile and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/README and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/mailer.conf and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/access.sample and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/virtusertable.sample and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/mailertable.sample and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > *** Temp ./etc/mail/aliases and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting > > Shouldn't some of these CVS Ids be increased by forced commits? Not necessarily. If the update of Sendmail was a bugfix or a security fix, backported to RELENG_6, and these files didn't include changes in the vendor branch or as part of the fix, then they have the same RCS id line.