From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 18 09:09:42 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13E616A400
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl)
Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E12A13C43E
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl)
Received: from s040391.lan (a80-100-31-69.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.100.31.69])
	by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2I99eSP023228
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:09:41 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl)
From: Bram Schoenmakers <bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:09:40 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <200703151857.19679.bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl>
	<200703151953.36380.bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl>
	<45FA791F.2070004@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <45FA791F.2070004@dial.pipex.com>
X-Face: &[!|}QvdlkzFIu, |mW.\-Ci1t2d@CEo+#Q14@XM9*@`S, @l*5r-m!\, ,
	kFc:ZlD62]6/>=?utf-8?q?=5B=0A=09Ovg=3BN=5Bqk=3B=60w6=3D5abys2!H+EUYcEDJ?=<R$6{yw]Wn]%kBpfM!H{Z:/MG[=]8"l":u7mOK)=?utf-8?q?bV=0A=09d?=<@pasEk@x{^+[vVtDh0l#Gnr1@L7foyeRl8`ANOb*VekgZ|-\Td<|{:T>=?utf-8?q?=25lo=26d67gO=2E!/=0A=09w?=@YD{YH]Ebe{@|(qtKgoum%{-=qXlf.+/`^E<'!m"?5d<&C(:B+p*KjP'-Knv!6U<=?utf-8?q?1W!=7EZ=0A=09P3ee-=7BfAb-i+MsJHM?=@
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200703181009.40157.bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl>
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: Re: 'nodump' on directories: new contents still dumped
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:09:42 -0000

Op vrijdag 16 maart 2007, schreef Alex Zbyslaw:
> Can you try explicitly putting a "-h 0" into your incremental command
> line and see if that makes a difference?

I've done that and now dump behaves like it should. I don't understand why, 
because the man page says that -h 1 is default (and shouldn't be supplied 
then). But with -h 0 on every incremental dump it's OK now.

Thanks for the ideas.

-- 
Bram Schoenmakers

You can contact me directly with Yahoo Instant Messenger with
bramschoenmakers