From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 10:28:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C08D16A417; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE1513C483; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435BA2095; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:27:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8E62094; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:27:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 82BE084437; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:27:57 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Max Laier References: <20070828211440.470805B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> <200708282324.05834.max@love2party.net> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:27:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200708282324.05834.max@love2party.net> (Max Laier's message of "Tue\, 28 Aug 2007 23\:23\:56 +0200") Message-ID: <86absa3aaa.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , Pascal Hofstee Subject: Re: ZFS kernel panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:28:03 -0000 Max Laier writes: > This is complete nonsense! As you pointed out earlier zfs doesn't > know anything about the nature of the error. There is only one > sensible way to deal with a disk error - unless it is transient - and > that is stopping all (write) access to the drive. As you can't easily > move a mounted drive with opened files into read-only mode, a panic is > the only way to make sure. Actually, remounting the disk read-only upon encountering a write error is standard behaviour in Linux. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no