From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 23 12:49:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 61D7C11D; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:49:09 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r358722 - head/Mk
Message-ID: <20140623124909.GB18367@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201406211708.s5LH8ZvE087036@svn.freebsd.org>
 <CAF6rxgkeu0BG5pzN1rJ=u=5VnNgmVuN2PWbay13RY7qMt7JCmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:49:09 -0000

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:45:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:17:19AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > IMHO this is silly.  The risk of changing description text is almost
> > zero.  Sweeping changes should be reviewed, but I don't think gating
> > the review on a member of portmgr is useful.
> > 
> Given what happened recently on those yes portmgr needs to review those
> sweep

I don't see why those won't be caught via normal peer reviews.  There is
always someone's watching those svn diffs.

./danfe