From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 12:43:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 9CDF316A52E; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:12 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B1716A52E for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBD043D1D for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1NKhBGe083234 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1NKhB7e083231 for perforce@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:43:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402232043.i1NKhB7e083231@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to jhb@freebsd.org using -f From: John Baldwin To: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: PERFORCE change 47490 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:43:13 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=47490 Change 47490 by jhb@jhb_slimer on 2004/02/23 12:42:32 Add another todo inspired by bms@. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/smpng/sys/notes#7 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/smpng/sys/notes#7 (text+ko) ==== @@ -60,5 +60,9 @@ - Consolidate most of the kernel procs into a 'system' kernel proc that would be pid 0. - Stick all the 'idle threads' in a single 'idle' kernel proc. +- kill taskqueue_swi in favor of taskqueue_thread since the only thing swi + buys is being able to swi_sched() from a fast handler, but that doesn't + make sense because you can't actually enqueue a task onto its queue from + a fast interrupt context Space reserved for child branches: