From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jul 1 7:38:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ints.ru (ints.ru [194.67.173.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F8D37BB0E; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 07:38:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ilmar@ints.ru) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.2) id SAA14766; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:38:10 +0400 (MSD) Received: from ws-ilmar.ints.ru(194.67.173.16) via SMTP by ints.ru, id smtpdu14764; Sat Jul 1 18:38:06 2000 Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:38:05 +0400 (MSD) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" To: wilko@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy In-Reply-To: <20000701162633.A18343@freebie.wbnet> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > Can somebody move thing around in sys? I mean put all fs code under let > > say '/sys/fs' subdir. And all network protocols code under /sys/net > > (or netproto)? > Why? Because you like it better? Or to confuse the h*ck out of people who > are used to the current tree? I think that it would be better because kernel become be better structured that way. Now we have more that 40 subdirs in /sys, 4 fs subdirs (isofs, fs, miscfs, ufs), 3 standalone fs dirs (msdosfs, ntfs and nwfs). isofs and fs subdirs are containing only one entry each. So why not to merge all this code under one subdir /sys/fs? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message