From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 28 03:13:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11109106566B; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00798FC19; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so7564928ywp.13 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:13:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Jx9nKUw8SEMfowVnvVfvP0S4JZVE0orCzjdwvKKP50M=; b=nMdx7o92t0KJsZ6Hjo/SBacGdVCb2Q2u15IlReaDCPsXWbWpywhhmhTSuDlSVmSr9p hnaSE7i/doO3iQjesawaFDsReXFFrsSYJKysKAg1Aq87B1PXVK6qxa/jC72gANhtasAG FjsH4L+dGBj84YxKu/KwB+vxJfM228kxPEUJE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.201.165 with SMTP id b25mr2106446yho.72.1317179583082; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.42 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:13:03 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WNGcK-0CwR3VfmOJ9WiE66bOnAc Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: [CFT] hostap mode fixes with ath(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:13:04 -0000 Hi all, I've just committed some hostap related ath(4) and ath_hal fixes to -HEAD. I've been testing these in my local 11n tree for the last few weeks and they've improved stability with all the 11n NICs but it has had the most impact when using the AR9220/AR9280 NICs. I'd appreciate it if I could get some third party verification here, especially if it has fixed things or broken things for you. I'd also like to hear if it has no impact. :-) I'd like to merge these back into 9.0 before -release occurs but I won't do it without enough testing. Thanks, Adrian