From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 11 08:39:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B241E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A8B43F93
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:39:15 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA11456;
	Wed, 12 Nov 2003 03:37:25 +1100
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 03:37:24 +1100 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Jason <jason@ec.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FB04BBD.9020905@ec.rr.com>
Message-ID: <20031112033244.T1363@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <3FB04BBD.9020905@ec.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Found a problem with new source code
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:39:18 -0000

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jason wrote:

> I just wanted to let someone know that my buildworld fails at
> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c at line 362.  I get an undefined
> error for RB_BOOTINFO, by adding #define RB_BOOTINFO 0x1f it worked.

Sorry, I broke it last night.  it is now fixed.

> Also it failed at sendmail.fc or something, I don't use send mail so I
> just did not build it.  It looks like someone already reported the
> device apic problem.  I just tryed option smp and device apic on my
> single proc athlon, panic on boot unless I chose no apic or is it no
> acpi(?) at boot.
>
> By the way, why adding the smp options do any good for my machine?  I
> mostly care about speed, but it seems it might just make the os unstable
> for me.

No; it is only good for multi-CPU machines.

Bruce