From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 03:15:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE5516A41F for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:15:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCFE43D45 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:15:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAF3FfQY066266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:15:41 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jAF3FeuS024019; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:15:40 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:15:40 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511150315.jAF3FeuS024019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: efrenba@yahoo.es In-reply-to: <20051114191719.62422.qmail@web25501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (message from Efren Bravo on Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:17:18 +0100 (CET)) References: <20051114191719.62422.qmail@web25501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:15:49 -0000 > Can freeBSD be used as RAS server for windows > boxes? Yes I used to do that, having pluged in an interface card with 2 serial ports (for a total of 4 ports and 4 modems) The thing was to configure PPP to use Chap authentication (but you need to keep clear text password on your RAS machine). It worked OK, even if from time to time the connection was not released properly, making a port unavailable. That's a poorman solution anyway, as you cannot expect faster access than 33kbps. I cannot give much more details than that as I replaced that machine with a real RAS a couple of years back, that real RAS being an embeded machine running... FreeBSD (version 1.something!) So RAS and FreeBSD? Definitely yes :)) Olivier