From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 03:54:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC07D16A4CF for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 03:54:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.databits.net [216.118.117.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A413643D2F for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 03:54:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by hex.databits.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B74E757B10; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:54:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:54:36 -0600 From: Will Andrews To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041107035436.GE19115@hex.databits.net> Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org References: <200411061126.23666.msch@snafu.de> <20041106152125.GC80167@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200411061803.21539.msch@snafu.de> <20041106173913.GA80837@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20041107003413.GQ24507@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20041107020016.GA88916@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041107020016.GA88916@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: gvinum works fine [was Re: gvinum remains broken in 5.3-RELEASE?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 03:54:37 -0000 --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:30:16PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Scott Long has taken offence to this statement and asked me to retract > it. My apologies to Scott for the unintentional offence. My > statement is utter hogwash and an incredible insult to everyone > involved. I've done an incredible disservice here. Of course Vinum > users don't need to avoid 5.3-RELEASE. And I sure didn't. RAID0, used in old vinum, now used in 5.3-STABLE as of yesterday with geom_vinum: /dev/gvinum/puck 196G 75G 110G 41% /net/puck 2 drives: D puck2 State: up /dev/ad10s1h A: 0/103799 MB (0%) D puck1 State: up /dev/ad8h A: 0/103799 MB (0%) 1 volume: V puck State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 202 GB 1 plex: P puck.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 202 GB 2 subdisks: S puck.p0.s0 State: up D: puck1 Size: 101 GB S puck.p0.s1 State: up D: puck2 Size: 101 GB # Vinum configuration of puck.firepipe.net, saved at Sat Nov 6 22:53:59 20= 04 drive puck2 device /dev/ad10s1h drive puck1 device /dev/ad8h volume puck plex name puck.p0 org striped 256s vol puck sd name puck.p0.s0 drive puck1 len 212580352s driveoffset 265s plex puck.p0= plexoffset 0s sd name puck.p0.s1 drive puck2 len 212580352s driveoffset 265s plex puck.p0= plexoffset 256s Regards, --=20 wca --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBjZx7F47idPgWcsURAkWhAKCDuQ/75BpfCCKBauRJjpzNfJB0oQCeJmrr RcqOLJMi845/OXVxnAoUlVY= =pQeZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a--