From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 07:10:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC14010656B0 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 07:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13F88FC0A for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 07:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA8D105F42; Sat, 10 May 2008 03:00:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 10 May 2008 03:00:41 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: GzpsE8a7BBemiEOz1WEPeIo3dOUkZa7CTQtjDtC+lNFR 1210402841 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00495D6C3; Sat, 10 May 2008 03:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <48254817.3030802@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:00:39 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zaphod Beeblebrox References: <4824F1B4.6010302@elischer.org> <5f67a8c40805092057y166d549x2dc2fe397f016c79@mail.gmail.com> <4825468B.3050307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4825468B.3050307@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Julian Elischer , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Multiple routing table support commited X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 07:10:26 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: >> >> >From my read of your file, this doesn't address FreeBSD's utter lack >> of what >> they often call an RIB >> > > Please read the history of this thread, as there has been extensive > discussion on this subject. Whoops, didn't realize this was -current, haven't had my coffee. Sorry -- this topic has been bashed around a lot on net@ over the past few months. If multipath support is something which really concerns you, there are a number of issues which have to be solved. There are a number of ways you can get involved, but probably the best and most direct way is to learn C and start hacking the code yourself -- it is open source after all and people seem to forget this. Good luck. BMS