From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 17:15:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9239937B401; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 17:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.76.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019F43F93; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 17:15:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from CooCooCaChoo@myrealbox.com) Received: from matthewymj3upb (210.50.172.108) by smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.015) id 3ECBEA340020EA8E; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:15:41 +1000 From: "Matthew Gardiner" To: "Alexander Kabaev" , "Crist J. Clark" Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:15:41 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20030603160754.3b4da1c4.ak03@gte.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: crist.clark@attbi.com cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: RE: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 00:15:45 -0000 >> >> Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I >> have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building >> HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now. >> >> I suggest that the original poster double-check that he has RELENG_5_1 >> and not HEAD. And I do have buildworld logs. I'll send in a separate >> mail. > > No need that. This is a bug and it needs to be fixed. I am working on > this. Thanks for the reports. Just a quick question, what version of GCC is going to appear in FreeBSD 5.1? I heard that it maybe GCC 3.2.3 and that GCC 3.3 (depending on its stability) will be used for 5.2. Could someone either confirm or correct me on this assumption? Matthew Gardiner