From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Nov 12 14:16:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA14949
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:16:26 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from wavefront.wavefront.com (root@ns.wavefront.com [204.73.244.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA14943
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:16:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from ocean@wavefront.com)
Received: from wavefront.com by wavefront.wavefront.com (8.6.10/SMI-4.1.R931202)
	id QAA24065; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 16:15:15 -0600
Message-ID: <346A390D.E05F72A2@wavefront.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 17:17:33 -0600
From: Michael Porter <ocean@wavefront.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03b8 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: calcru: negative time: XXXXX usec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

     I sometime get an error of
calcru: negative time: XXXXX usec
Usually there will be a few of these in a row when it happens.  The most
recent, there's more than 3 screen fulls of them (via dmesg) and I
noticed that every amount is smaller than the preceeding one.  I must
mention that I am overclocking my Pent 75 MHz to 90 MHz.  Is this a big
deal?  If it's not because of the overclocking, what can be done about
it?

Thanks,
Michael Porter
ocean@wavefront.com
port0095@tc.umn.edu