From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 17 05:04:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2871343132 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mail.foucry.net (fournil.foucry.net [95.217.83.231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49mtKZ65cDz4HhW for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques+freebsd@foucry.net) Received: from mithril.localdomain (2a01cb0400bb0900ea6a64fffe0795a1.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr [IPv6:2a01:cb04:bb:900:ea6a:64ff:fe07:95a1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.foucry.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B6D33C9F5 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:04:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foucry.net; s=dkim; t=1592370282; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Md/z+Ip7hxqTmizZLNbGXX1E6oZA5eODj7P+uriUp+M=; b=bQoivmZoaXHPqOD8CHDx9bbAmENf/RpnAfQbjPrLogOrqT3l8Gveh9FEU1keGU1z7MnGJw 4a3uGWCGhc3tO/OLOo2Mf0sNOODTMTwo10a92P1aAPPFHJ8lj5xRzI/uCaW4kvYDLreBkm e3T6sdD54n6Evp2oPugeNCGV7uolrxU= Received: from mithril (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mithril.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE98F1219A for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:04:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:04:41 +0200 From: Jacques Foucry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does FreeBSD not use the Linux kernel? Message-ID: <20200617050441.GC16409@mithril> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3a48ab1ab198c330400be3e942f921f2cd3c3e11.camel@tom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3a48ab1ab198c330400be3e942f921f2cd3c3e11.camel@tom.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.60 X-Rspamd-Server: mail.foucry.net X-Spam-Score: -1.60 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49mtKZ65cDz4HhW X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=foucry.net header.s=dkim header.b=bQoivmZo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=foucry.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jacques@foucry.net designates 95.217.83.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jacques@foucry.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.02 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[foucry.net:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.929]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.027]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[foucry.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[foucry.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.56)[-0.561]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:95.217.0.0/16, country:DE]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:04:51 -0000 Le mercredi 17 juin 2020 à 11:33:25 (+0800), kindu smith à écrit: [sni] Is there a new troll every week on the list? Is it mandaroy to the list? I did not read about that をhen suscribing. (jut kidding) -- Jacques Foucry