From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 26 12:10:17 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A48937B41A; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g1QK9wf96514; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:09:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:09:58 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200202262009.g1QK9wf96514@apollo.backplane.com> To: Julian Elischer , core@freebsd.org Cc: "M. Warner Losh" , jake@locore.ca, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 exception.s genassym.c machdep.c... References: Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :abuse? :what abuse. : :I think MAtt can be asked to "back it out and hold it for a few days. :But I also think that there needs to be soemwher for him to apeal to. : :Until there is somewhere for him to apeal to it is pointless for him to :back it out. Backing out assumes that there is a conflict resolution :system. Presently there is none. : :How about YOU suggest that when it is backed out, core will :make a decision as to whether his work deserves to be committed and :That JHB be asked to "put up or shut up". John is doing good work but as :long as he uses P4, this is going to keep happenning. Stop screaming at :the symptom and fix the problem! All right, all right! I'll back it out. But JHB has nothing even remotely close to what this patch accomplishes. I want to see this patch go back INTO the tree ASAP, and if it takes a core decision to allow me to commit it then that is what I am asking for now. You hear that, core? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message