Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:12:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: anders@FreeBSD.org, brooks@FreeBSD.org, kde@FreeBSD.org, flz@FreeBSD.org, gecko@FreeBSD.org, ler@lerctr.org, yds@CoolRat.org, ashish@FreeBSD.org, ehaupt@FreeBSD.org, cy@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, bra@fsn.hu, "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>, office@FreeBSD.org, gerald@FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com, ale@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [linimon@FreeBSD.org: ports/170946: [patch] mark certain ports broken on ARM] Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208251705530.5727@ghan.fvgr> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgntLd%2BFAM_KGjkKzZOmhvdaOEXJg4YL1b7yYrCYgpx=0w@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120823232736.GE13223@lonesome.com> <5036BF97.60903@aldan.algebra.com> <CAF6rxgntLd%2BFAM_KGjkKzZOmhvdaOEXJg4YL1b7yYrCYgpx=0w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Mark Linimon wrote: > FYI, I would like your approval on these (just the commit of BROKEN; I > do not expect you to try to fix them). > > gerald@FreeBSD.org lang/gcc42 For lang/gcc42 I just added arm to NOT_FOR_ARCHS. On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: > NOT and ONLY are meant for ports which by definition will never work > another arch (think x86info). In this case the ports are just broken. I think in case of an old version of some software NOT_FOR_ARCHS can also be valid, especially if the problem goes deeper (and it has been addressed in a newer version/newer port that is available). Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1208251705530.5727>