From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 17:21:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401F716A4CE; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E101D43D2D; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:21:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i211LBOJ054962; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:21:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i211L8BL054961; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:21:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:21:07 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Wes Peters Message-ID: <20040301012107.GA54337@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200402260234.i1Q2YDx1014240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040226061846.GB15864@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040227182325.GA81744@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200402291611.45616.wes@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402291611.45616.wes@softweyr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: Max Laier cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/pf/net if_pflog.c if_pflog.h if_pfsync.c if_pfsync.h pf.c pf_ioctl.c pf_norm.c pf_osfp.c pf_table.c pfvar.h src/sys/contrib/pf/netinet in4_cksum.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 01:21:13 -0000 On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:11:45PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: > On Friday 27 February 2004 10:23 am, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 06:18:46AM +0000, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > > > > > We do not plan to remove ipfw or ipfilter at this time nor do we have > > > plans to remove them, until pf receives further evaluation by the > > > user base, there would be no mandate or grounding for such a > > > decision. > > > > If any of ipfw, ipfilter, or ip6fw are candidates for removal, then > > it needs to be done before 5-STABLE is branched. Otherwise, we need > > to find individuals to actively maintain each of these throughout the > > lifetime of 5.X (a 3 to 5 year time span). > > ipfw2 is being actively maintained and developed. Semi-maintained. The ipfw2 developer (1) doesn't develope with -CURRENT, and (2) never tests the !i386 case. pf(4) is much better maintained across all our platforms.