From owner-cvs-all Sat Mar 14 02:03:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA12598 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:03:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA12592; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:03:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA06438; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:02:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Paul Traina cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dumb question about fstab and 226 beta In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:19:08 PST." <199803140019.QAA01896@red.juniper.net> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:02:14 -0800 Message-ID: <6432.889869734@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Was this intentional? If not, can we fix this before 226 ships? The general change was intentional but not the unwonted side-effects. Mike Smith is still working on the more robust solution as we speak and it's certainly my expectation that we'll have this hammered out well before 2.2.6 ships. The "yardstick" we're using for this is getting a freshly installed 2.2.5 to upgrade to 2.2.6 without any such problems. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message