From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Tue Mar 2 19:30:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B2554E1BF for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (phouka1.phouka.net [107.170.196.116]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "phouka.net", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DqnK016frz3Fq4 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 122JSrXa086211 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 11:28:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 122JSrPV086210; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 11:28:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from warlock) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 11:28:53 -0800 From: John Kennedy To: Karl Denninger Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: digital ocean droplet, FreeBSD update from 11.2 to 12.2p4, zpool upgrade and boot sector ? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DqnK016frz3Fq4 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of warlock@phouka1.phouka.net has no SPF policy when checking 107.170.196.116) smtp.mailfrom=warlock@phouka1.phouka.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[phouka.net]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[107.170.196.116:from]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[107.170.196.116:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[warlock@phouka.net,warlock@phouka1.phouka.net]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[warlock@phouka.net,warlock@phouka1.phouka.net]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:107.170.192.0/18, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:30:12 -0000 On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:12:29PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > I have used freebsd-upgrade on DO droplets (including ZFS ones) without > a problem, but I did *not* upgrade the pool for exactly this reason -- I > have no visibility into where their hypervisor gets the loader and > whether I might screw myself. My droplet is currently 13.0-BETA4 #93 releng/13.0-n244592-e32bc2536297 with no zpool upgrade issues, but I always shut it down and take an offline snapshot before I upgrade it just in case it would blow up. This has been upgraded in place since whatever was current on 2017-04-10.