Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:53:10 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere-devel build of sysutils/u-boot-pine64 | u-boot-pine64-2018.07_1 failed Message-ID: <AD62A188-CF4B-427A-8295-BE0EBB2E0669@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <4DBB7051-AEC9-4ECA-B645-0A5AF1C7C856@yahoo.com> References: <451D906A-3807-4029-BFFA-1A00AD8FB0F9@yahoo.com> <6D377AEB-C359-4DC3-A95F-2A4A72CBF090@yahoo.com> <20180801095942.91dfc4d5907b75b4fe63c1d0@bidouilliste.com> <E88C0B8E-F28C-457E-8A13-4CB593F72FA3@yahoo.com> <20180802060927.72eadf5b1f8fe8bcf8860dc3@bidouilliste.com> <DD97C57E-D956-4CB3-B306-E31F07192B1B@yahoo.com> <4DBB7051-AEC9-4ECA-B645-0A5AF1C7C856@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[BUILD_DEPENDS+= objdump:devel/binutils is sufficient to allow my poudreire-devel context to build u-boot-pine64 .] On 2018-Aug-1, at 11:47 PM, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: > [See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230288 .] > > On 2018-Aug-1, at 10:57 PM, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-Aug-1, at 9:09 PM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:02:08 -0700 >>> Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot at freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2018-Aug-1, at 12:59 AM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> . . . >>>> >>>> Definitely true that I do not yet know what matters for this context. >>>> I'll continue to try to figure that out. >>> >>> Well it's a port and you are building via poudriere so just put the >>> log file (the full log file) somewhere so we can have a look. >>> Also arch, ports tree revision, blah, the usual suspects. >> >> The build did not get far: the log file is only 747 lines long. I'll >> probably submit a bugzilla for the issue at some point. I'll report >> the number when I do. > > See: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230288 > >> I suggest looking at: >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2018-August/113981.html >> >> for a recent build failure type that I analyzed (devel/*-gcc failures). John Baldwin >> reduced the history down to the final result for our exchanges and so it will will not >> be a long read. The issue was tied to my use of WITHOUT_BINTUILS for the buildworld >> that was installed and in use but devel/powerpc64-gcc (the master port for the >> devel/*-gcc ports) not listing devel/binutils in BUILD_DEPENDS in addition to the >> historical devel/${PKGNAMEPREFIX}binutils for the cross-build. >> >> Other gcc-ish ports that cross-build things may have similar issues with expecting >> but missing "builder-architecture" tools from binutils. I'm not claiming that is >> the problem here but it is a fairly new type of problem to be aware of. >> >> >> >> Just FYI for the pine64 u-boot port context: >> (To be in the bugzilla submittal as well.) >> >> # uname -apKU >> FreeBSD FBSDUSSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r336693M amd64 amd64 1200075 1200075 >> >> (The "M" is mostly for experiments targeting powerpc and powerpc64 >> via fairly modern toolchains. The poudriere-devel jail uses an >> install-tree installed from the same buildworld.) >> >> # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]" >> Relative URL: ^/head >> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports >> Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 >> Revision: 476026 >> Last Changed Rev: 476026 I've udpated: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230288 with the following comment: QUOTE The following change to sysutils/u-boot-master/Makefile was sufficient to allow sysutils/u-boot-pine64 to build in my poudriere-devel context that is based on a buildworld that uses WITHOUT_BINTUTILS. (I'm not claiming this is the best form of fix, just noting the behavior of the specific change.) # svnlite diff /usr/ports/sysutils/u-boot-master/Makefile Index: /usr/ports/sysutils/u-boot-master/Makefile =================================================================== --- /usr/ports/sysutils/u-boot-master/Makefile (revision 476026) +++ /usr/ports/sysutils/u-boot-master/Makefile (working copy) @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ dtc>=1.4.1:sysutils/dtc \ mkimage:sysutils/u-boot-tools BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${COMPILER}:devel/${COMPILER} +BUILD_DEPENDS+= objdump:devel/binutils USES= bison gmake python:2.7,build shebangfix tar:bz2 BINARY_ALIAS= bison=${LOCALBASE}/bin/bison dtc=${LOCALBASE}/bin/dtc sed=gsed swig=swig3.0 I've not isolated where the builder environment's binutil tool(s) are put to use but this seems to solidly indicate that there is such use for sysutils/u-boot-pine64 . END QUOTE === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD62A188-CF4B-427A-8295-BE0EBB2E0669>