From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 18 21:34:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-168.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16F837B405 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (topperwein.dyndns.org [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9J4Yrs01000 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:34:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:34:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: How does FreeBSD performs in server tasks? [off-topic] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20011019002641.K645-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Conrado Vardanega wrote: > I would like to hear from Athlon-based server owners/admins how does it > performs with server tasks. My aim is to find out how good is a Pentium III > chip for a server instead a low-cost, high-performance Athlon CPU. I would > consider, for evaluation purposes, a (FreeBSD) system running > Apache/PHP/mod_ssl and MySQL mainly, because they're pretty sensitive to > user-response. So, which are the pros and cons of having a Intel based > server or a AMD based server? Support for Intel-based chipsets is likely to be more robust than for the AMD or VIA-based chipsets that exist on Athlon motherboards. As an example, it took awhile for XFree86 4.1.0 to be fixed to run on motherboards with the "Irongate" chipset (AMD 761 north bridge) when a Radeon QD video board is present. That said, my 1.333 GHz T-bird *flies*. I can build all of userland in around 40 minutes, a kernel in under 5 minutes, and all of XFree86 4.1.0 in about 20 minutes. For reference, I have 256MB of Crucial PC2100 ECC DDR on-board, and my disk is a WD Caviar ATA-66, 5400rpm. I have the write-caching sysctl enabled. Getting back to some more specific info you wanted, the only web app I run that has bearing is Kalendus, and it responds mighty quickly. > "Add-in" topic: how DDR-memory instead SDRAM affects server performance? It *rocks*. For another benchmark, I pulled 110 MFLOPs from this machine with the LINPACK benchmarks. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (Remove "bogus" before responding.) behanna@bogus.zbzoom.net I was raised by a pack of wild corn dogs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message