From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 30 11:18:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9A637B40B for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 11:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8UIIGv05137; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 20:18:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Bart Kus Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sio modification In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:56:02 CDT." <200109301226.0779@EO> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 20:18:16 +0200 Message-ID: <5135.1001873896@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200109301226.0779@EO>, Bart Kus writes: >On Sunday 30 September 2001 10:38, you wrote: >> Your machine will not work too well if it is 40kHz. >> >> The PPS-API allows you to timestamp edges on DCD, if the frequency is >> more reasonable, that would work for you. Find RFC27xx for more info >> about PPS-API. > > Oh really. I was actually reading pps.c, and it looked like it was for the >parallel port interrupt pin only. I'd rather avoid cutting up this connector >if I can. Is the DCD edge timestamp (which would be PERFECT) already >implemented, or is this a spec for me to write for when modifying sio.c? It's in sio.c already. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message