From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 3 22:06:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3A3E76 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 22:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16338FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 22:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wc20so5815201obb.13 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VSu79yUK2Jh2URCRpgNlJgheUeX6CuOEYkwdvB2EgDQ=; b=garWyqjg2FcbRqk6MRVE44Nx+jNGV/hr7Vh4VPAmyiFQ4gUh+b13AYfuKd9Y7oXlq2 s2JQp2C44KxCNvX4u3zZHcIvcXYWLVjhxBk0jy+KdsbopeK6BCoejMQh+mbNg5e4PgQ4 YYE2I0i+MeKJP6++Vnqf4JrUriz7UjyY3DZBgA9JC730i+Yj8oAk3vdANU/okTdgHuAY NEu3+YFMz5hC4SLgzPvUJ1hwN+WoOI1dVE9UfDu++q8r+WTTaYUe2fnQ/uWyMqyqziaf Q4EO3bNtqoOAk71TEDoTgcR1G4aKDnm8o0SJNpCoNkuYRvVO+RoycGJNPOgavGSkD418 pDig== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.4.174 with SMTP id l14mr4472628obl.88.1351980410305; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.80.104 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201211032130.PAA04484@lariat.net> References: <201211032130.PAA04484@lariat.net> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:06:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? From: Adam Vande More To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:06:51 -0000 On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > Have been following the thread related to SU+J, and am wondering: why is it > considered to be undesirable on SSDs (assuming that they have good wear > leveling)? Superstition -- Adam Vande More