From owner-freebsd-security Sun Feb 24 7:40:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576DE37B402 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 07:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 2EC985341; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:40:36 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Jeff Palmer" Cc: Subject: Re: Couple of concerns with default rc.firewall References: <003b01c1bcda$d4f06020$0286a8c0@home.lan> <001101c1bd48$2df35020$0286a8c0@home.lan> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 24 Feb 2002 16:40:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <001101c1bd48$2df35020$0286a8c0@home.lan> Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jeff Palmer" writes: > Maybe you fail to see my point. I was wondering if there was a reason the > FreeBSD team has decided not to allow certain ICMP's by default. > I'm perfectly aware of how to change the rules to do what I want. I was > asking if there was a reason for this decision, or if it was an oversight. Are you trying to say that "deny ip from any to any" should *not* block all IP packets? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message