From owner-freebsd-net Tue Mar 19 1:26:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEFE37B404; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 01:26:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from svzserv.kemerovo.su (kost [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2J9QV589345; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:26:31 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Message-ID: <3C97043B.449715B2@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:26:19 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Crist J. Clark" Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: natd and static nat for different subnets References: <3C96CCDA.C54342F5@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20020318225141.I60554@blossom.cjclark.org> <3C96E940.95335672@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20020319011822.K60554@blossom.cjclark.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Crist J. Clark" wrote: > > Would it be hard to implement this? > > Probably not too bad. Apparently no stampede for this functionality > though. There usually is not a lot to gain by mapping different > internal networks to different external addresses except maybe some > warm fuzzies. Consider small-to-medium ISP and consumer's networks with little demand of real IP addresses. > > Is it issue of natd itself or of libalias? > I think it's more of a libalias(3) issue. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message