From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 5 9: 9: 3 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 5 09:09:01 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dsl-64-193-169-237.telocity.com (dsl-64-193-169-237.telocity.com [64.193.169.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713A537B400 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowfox by dsl-64-193-169-237.telocity.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 143La5-0003j6-00; Tue, 05 Dec 2000 11:08:41 -0600 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:08:41 -0600 To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: Alfred Perlstein , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load-Balancing - any solutions? Message-ID: <20001205110841.A14207@yipyap.net> References: <105102226954.20001205163641@x-itec.de> <20001205074217.Y8051@fw.wintelcom.net> <5676150678.20001205165002@buz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5676150678.20001205165002@buz.ch>; from gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:50:02PM +0100 From: Brian McGroarty Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:50:02PM +0100, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > Hello Alfred, > > Tuesday, December 05, 2000, 4:42:17 PM, you wrote: > > Check out 'rsync' and the rest of the ports collection, there's > > good stuff in there. > > > I'm still looking for something somewhat faster (i.e. no more than a few > seconds lag between the master and the slave servers)... With just two systems, running squid on one machine to access the second is a decent solution. This has the advantage of being completely self-updating and trivial to maintain. Some also use several squid servers and hide the real web server from public access completely. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message