Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:22:50 -0400
From:      "MikeM" <the.lists@mgm51.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: postfix or qmail?
Message-ID:  <200506191122500702.00A479A6@sentry.24cl.com>
In-Reply-To: <42B46EF0.1080406@dial.pipex.com>
References:  <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org> <200506181025.25239.kirk@strauser.com> <42B46EF0.1080406@dial.pipex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 6/18/2005 at 7:58 PM Alex Zbyslaw wrote:

|Kirk Strauser wrote:
|
|>My choice is Postfix.  It's still under active development and 
|>isn't hampered by bizarre licensing and enormous egos.
|>  
|>
|Active development has to be the killer argument.  Who wants to 
|rely on software that no-one cares enough about to develop 
|properly?
 =============

Another reason in favor of Postfix -- the Postfix user support mailing list
is excellent.  qmail support mailing list is less than helpful.

http://www.postfix.org/lists.html








Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506191122500702.00A479A6>