From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 7 03:58:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA13038 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 03:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA13033 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 03:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.4/8.8.4) with UUCP id LAA18663; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 11:44:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from [194.32.164.2] by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 11:43:37 +0100 X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199706070915.MAA04799@shadows.aeon.net> References: from Craig Johnston at "Jun 6, 97 03:52:17 pm" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 11:40:26 +0100 To: craig@gnofn.org (Craig Johnston) From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: gcc -m486, gcc -O2 Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> Is there any reason -O2 would not be a good idea for kernel/make >> world in make.conf? I notice that the suggested use is -O2 for >> everything else and -O for the kernel. FWIW, I have -O2 -pipe on my -current box. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK