From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 8 11:45:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ip68-14-62-49.no.no.cox.net (ip68-14-62-49.no.no.cox.net [68.14.62.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A3937B402 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:45:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by ip68-14-62-49.no.no.cox.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g28Jjdp67853 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:45:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20020308181648.GA81533@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 13:45:39 -0600 (CST) Reply-To: conrads@cox.net Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-crazed Hippies From: Conrad Sabatier To: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: Need for explicit ipfw pass rule for 127.0.0.0/8 not documen Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 08-Mar-2002 Alan Eldridge wrote: > > I was forwarded the Mini-HEADS-UP mail. That has *got* to go in the > RELNOTES.TXT for 4.5-STABLE. It should go in /usr/src/UPDATING, too. > As I understand it, it's not an ipfw change, it's an rc.firewall* change. > And if it bites you, you have nothing but intuition to tell you what's > wrong, since the dropped packets are not logged. I don't understand. This mini-HEADS UP was posted to -stable recently, which, since you're running -stable, you *are* subscribed to and do read, right? -- Conrad Sabatier "Never underestimate the power of a small tactical nuclear weapon." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message