From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 7 07:59:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA26387 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 07:59:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bugs.us.dell.com (bugs.us.dell.com [143.166.169.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA26373 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tony@dell.com) Received: from ant (ant.us.dell.com [143.166.12.34]) by bugs.us.dell.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA08566 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 09:58:23 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980507095816.00689420@bugs.us.dell.com> X-Sender: tony@bugs.us.dell.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 09:58:16 -0500 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG From: Tony Overfield Subject: Re: ISA-PnP w\o BIOS support? In-Reply-To: References: <199805070251.TAA00511@antipodes.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Smith wrote: > [...] by taking advantage of the > fact that most systems *do* have PnP BIOS support. Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: >This assumption is wrong. I'd be very surprised if any new system built in the last three years didn't include PnP BIOS support. IMHO, anything older than that is approaching obsolescence anyway. Can anybody tell me who still builds systems without PnP BIOS support? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message