Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:12:36 +1100
From:      Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
To:        Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: INET6 -- and why I don't use it 
Message-ID:  <200803070112.m271CauD083943@drugs.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:06:25 BST." <20080306230625.5c6df098.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:24:08 -0800
> Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote:
> 
> > You don't set up an IPv6 network. You simply have end nodes that will
> > use IPv6 when/if it is available by just making a one-line change in
> > rc.conf as opposed to a kernel re-build.
> 
> But to make it (an ip v6 network) useful, I (as an end user) would need
> a dns domain for the machines I control, preferable a zone that *I* have
> control over.
> 
> In other words; if I have machines with ipv6 adresses that I can reach
> globally, but don't have a dns name for them, the usefulness is very
> limited.
> 
> Is that challenge solved somehow with ipv6?
> It doesn't look like dyndns.org supports ipv6 in their free service.

	Talk to dyndns.org.

	From a protocol perspective all this was solved years ago.
	Windows boxes use UPDATE everyday to do this.

	Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200803070112.m271CauD083943>