From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 14 12:27:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ceia.nordier.com (m1-15-dbn.dial-up.net [196.34.155.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5199E1514A for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 12:27:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rnordier@nordier.com) Received: (from rnordier@localhost) by ceia.nordier.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id WAA09966; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:24:10 +0200 (SAT) From: Robert Nordier Message-Id: <199903142024.WAA09966@ceia.nordier.com> Subject: Re: [BTX loader]: boot command doesn't work as expected In-Reply-To: <36EBEA87.66E7BF16@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at "Mar 15, 99 01:57:43 am" To: dcs@newsguy.com (Daniel C. Sobral) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:24:08 +0200 (SAT) Cc: ru@ucb.crimea.ua, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > boot -c - works > > boot /kernel - works > > boot -c /kernel - doesn't work > > > > Any clue? > > You mean it doesn't work as _you_ expect it to? :-) > > help boot > > Boot boots. The -c flag is to be passed to the kernel, not to the > command boot. > > boot /kernel -c I may be missing some subtle point here, but there should be no difference between boot -c /kernel and boot /kernel -c The "official" boot2 syntax, in both the old and the new bootblocks, is also [kernel_name] [options] but [options] [kernel_name] is equally acceptable in practice. In the case of loader, either way results in the same settings in the "howto" flags passed to the kernel. -- Robert Nordier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message