From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 09:58:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F37816A4CE; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:58:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out005.verizon.net (out005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C105743D49; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:58:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reso3w83@verizon.net) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.26.84.7]) by out005.verizon.net ESMTP <20050208095831.NDOI13383.out005.verizon.net@ringworm.mechee.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:58:31 -0600 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AB6EA2CE828; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:54:30 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:54:29 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502080756.j187urlc040282@freefall.freebsd.org> <42087296.2030402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <42087296.2030402@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502080154.30119.reso3w83@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [4.26.84.7] at Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:58:31 -0600 cc: Yen-Ming Lee Subject: Re: ports/77249: [MAINTAINER] sysutils/portmanager update to 0.2.6_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 09:58:33 -0000 On Tuesday 08 February 2005 12:04 am, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Yen-Ming Lee wrote: > > Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] sysutils/portmanager update to 0.2.6_1 > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: leeym > > State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 8 07:56:53 GMT 2005 > > State-Changed-Why: > > Committed, thanks. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=77249 > > It was a bad idea to break PREFIX complianting. Sergey, PREFIX compliance is still there, it is set in the package by default, an example: AC_ARG_WITH(etcdir, [ --with-etcdir= [contains portmanager's config file pm-020.conf, default @PREFIX@/etc/portmanager]], [[etcdir=@PREFIX@$withval]], [[etcdir=@PREFIX@/etc/portmanager]]) In other words: if --with-etcdir=something then etcdir=@PREFIX@$withval if not then default value is etcdir=@PREFIX@/etc/portmanager _mike