From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 30 10:35:48 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4DB2737B404; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net
	[207.217.120.188])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B758743F75; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com)
Received: from user-38lc133.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.4.99]
	helo=mindspring.com)
	by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 3.33 #1)	id 19X2Z6-0007RL-00; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:35:45 -0700
Message-ID: <3F0074A9.FE998647@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:34:33 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: deischen@freebsd.org
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306292017070.1865-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a44a9f80b2947c8cbe4900e333fdd75c08666fa475841a1c7a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rtprio and kse
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:35:48 -0000

Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
> > So if I interpret this correctly, to achieve the "expected" result,
> 
> What is the expected result?  I expect the expected result
> to be exactly the way that libkse works.  If you were to
> do the same thing in Solaris (pthreads), it would behave
> just like libkse works: it affects the LWP, not the thread,
> so any threads running in the LWP would benefit from
> the priority change.

I'd expect the creation of a seperate KSEG, so that only the thread
that made the request gets the priority boost.

-- Terry