From owner-cvs-ports  Sun May 26 19:05:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA11207
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 26 May 1996 19:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veda.is (root@ubiq.veda.is [193.4.230.60])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA11119;
          Sun, 26 May 1996 19:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA03222; Mon, 27 May 1996 02:05:15 GMT
From: Adam David <adam@veda.is>
Message-Id: <199605270205.CAA03222@veda.is>
Subject: Re: cvs commit:  ports/www/wn Makefile ports/www/wn/patches patch-aa ports/www/wn/pkg PLIST
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 02:05:14 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: adam@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199605270142.SAA01166@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "May 26, 96 06:42:39 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  *   move logfiles in by one directory level
> 
> Thanks, by the way, would you consider moving the docs into
> share/docs/wn instead of wn/docs?

The main reason for not doing this is to make them conveniently available as
part of the data tree to be served via http: URL. The docs could also be copied
for access by file: URL at share/docs/wn, but this would be duplication as they
can be accessed from the other location. It seems unnecessary clutter to have
index and index.cache files in the "share" tree.

I can be persuaded, if there are better reasons to move it to "share".

> The filenames probably should be
> explicitly listed in pkg/PLIST too.
> 
> Satoshi
> 

Noted, and will postpone it to do many ports in one pass.

Adam