Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:04:35 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha Message-ID: <86u0ndktd8.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20050315100007.GF696@loge.nixsys.be> References: <20050315092801.840557306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050315100007.GF696@loge.nixsys.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> writes: > Also, <don asbestos undies>, is there a specific reason for not having a = 64bit > wide time_t on Alpha? Historical reasons (comptability with OSF/1, I believe). Changing to a 64-bit time_t at this point would be inadvisable. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86u0ndktd8.fsf>