Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:49:55 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 255443] gpart(8): partition type portion is somewhat vague about symbolic name applicability to scheme types
Message-ID:  <bug-255443-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255443

            Bug ID: 255443
           Summary: gpart(8): partition type portion is somewhat vague
                    about symbolic name applicability to scheme types
           Product: Documentation
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Manual Pages
          Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: delphij@FreeBSD.org
                CC: doc@FreeBSD.org

The current manual page is somewhat vague regarding applicability of a symb=
olic
name (for example, 'ntfs') to partition scheme (for example, MBR) which can
cause confusion for users.

Possible improvements that I can think of for now:

a) Maybe tag the partition type with scheme names, e.g., instead of:

     ntfs                       A partition that contains a NTFS or exFAT
                                filesystem.  The scheme-specific type is "!=
7"
                                for MBR.

Do something like:

     ntfs                       [MBR only] A partition that contains a NTFS
                                or exFAT filesystem.  The scheme-specific=20
                                type is "!7" for MBR.

or

b) Make gpart(8) recognize the symbolic names in other schemes.  For 'ntfs',
just give the value of ms-basic-data when using GPT.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255443-9>