From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:17:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 16EE616A421; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:17:23 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeff Mohler Message-ID: <20070828221723.GB32597@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200708282052.l7SKqpIU021533@asus.tddhome> <20070828220355.GA32597@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: "Thomas D. Dean" , Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.11 binary compatibility (libm.so.2, etc) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:17:23 -0000 On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:13:04PM -0700, Jeff Mohler wrote: > On 8/28/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:52:51PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote: > > > Have you tried linking libm.so to libm.so.2? > > > > Sorry, but that's really bogus advice. > > > > Kris > > > It would work for MacGuyver or the A-Team... :) Kris