From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 8 21:39:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED07106566B for ; Sat, 8 May 2010 21:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com (mail-yx0-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9BE8FC19 for ; Sat, 8 May 2010 21:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe5 with SMTP id 5so1153322yxe.3 for ; Sat, 08 May 2010 14:39:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4dgTwwrpLsQUCCwX6voPsboklqpFRDYbZAI+0OrAtN4=; b=AUVDqh8WOU5w/1fWRrKWtr5KFm+kNW1zMRw1i17v0xyvG6ePBm5m2pZg0XAw6T4lXI Nj7G7lttTYC664IKFcqG0vyAZ2tDL2z0wmqJFkondp2KShoVhQdFB1ASRGvHE5/HI2sv f/Qkj1ufkvboH7/UTVayxrzKzmJdSa5hPmJaQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H7yoQ6J05EjVXm/043PV7qZHwfe8O9WhrcfHi54voRVg6LTJeJoccobvLVPP8Q+L7O 8vxJ+LTMzmXfpFFHWofVByJNLwZArH9zDhb7X3ulGw4P6gzXmN3EqPI9ecse/XHpiAs2 LJYMU6sZOwsK5Q6boI/Cqkir1TTFTaDD5b7Hs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.171.83 with SMTP id g19mr653497ibz.61.1273354781715; Sat, 08 May 2010 14:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.115.3 with HTTP; Sat, 8 May 2010 14:39:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:39:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: bf1783@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: alc@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent sys/vm/ changes and nvidia-driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 21:39:50 -0000 On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. wrote: > On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote: >> Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote: >>> >>>> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. =A0This round of >>>> changes >>>> are not yet complete. > > What performance differences, if any, can we expect on uniprocessors > from the vm page lock-related changes? Kip's original post on -arch > mentioned some performance improvements and no significant > regressions, but on a dual 4-core machine. Alan (or Kip): Is there a document available that describes the work being done on the VM system? I would like to -- or like make and attempt to -- read such a document... Hey b. f., to which post on -arch are you referring? -Brandon