From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 16:19:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA07816A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:19:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.frii.com (phobos01.frii.net [216.17.128.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3856C43D39 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:19:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@frii.com) Received: from elara.frii.com (elara.frii.com [216.17.128.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.frii.com (FRII) with ESMTP id 86F011DE9DE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:19:37 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:19:36 -0600 (MDT) From: Matt Ruzicka X-X-Sender: mattr@elara.frii.com To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Webmail Recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:19:38 -0000 I've seen this has gone back and forth in the past, but I didn't see much jumping out at me since 2003 in the searchable archives. I'm wondering what the current temperature of webmail software was. We are currently using SquirrelMail and although we are largely quite happy there are a number of minor oddities that are causing our more sensitive customers no end of frustration. Seeing as it appears about 25% of our customers use our webmail at least occasionally we're looking at potentially shifting gears in the not too distant future. What are other using and how happy are they with them? Looks like Horde and Open WebMail are still running reasonably strong, though I have never interacted with either of them. Are there new or recently re-emerged packages out there? Unfortunately we are looking for something with a reasonably slick interface (SquirrelMail is maybe lacking in this department a bit), as well as a solid backend. As we all know people only care if they notice the backend causes them problems, but almost everyone seems to care how something looks. Thanks in advance for any input. Matthew Ruzicka - Systems Administrator Front Range Internet, Inc. matt@frii.net - (970) 212-0728 Got SPAM? Take back your email with MailArmory. http://www.MailArmory.com