Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:16:44 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org> To: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACE wrappers Message-ID: <20000414151644.9D79568@pinyon.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> of "Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:42:19 %2B0700." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004141734040.4255-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
% %What are drawbacks of using ACE built without threads? That depends on your application. If the I/O/Event multiplexing is handled solely by a singleton reactor (even on the CORBA side) then single thread stuff works fine. The single thread configs on my site were supplied by a fellow who's supporting a single theaded TAO application on 4.0. OTOH my own application has multiple ORBs and threads, and wouldn't be possible otherwise. %Is it possible to make native exceptions work under RELENG_4 %or RELENG_3 or should we use ACE exceptions instead I'd love to see native exceptions work. Till then I've been using ACE exceptions. They're simple and I've had no problems with them (ace/CORBA_macros.h). %(we also plan to build our product under Win32, Solaris and Linux)? %Do ACE exceptions work under FreeBSD properly? Yup. You just got to stomach that ugliness factor. Once I got over it using them is just fine. HTH, Russell %thanks in advance % %/fjoe % To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000414151644.9D79568>