From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 22 0: 5:42 2000 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 22 00:05:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from devonshire.cnchost.com (devonshire.concentric.net [207.155.248.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0842E37B400 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:05:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffy (w072.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.72]) by devonshire.cnchost.com id DAA07349; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 03:05:39 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.10] Errors-To: From: "SteveB" To: Subject: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:07:32 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: <000901c06be9$00910570$aa240018@cx443070b> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of > Jeremiah Gowdy > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 11:30 PM > To: SteveB; Drew Eckhardt; hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT >> Trouble is there is no consistency in the rulings. > United States Code Title 17 Chapter 12 Section 1201 Subsection (f) Trouble is how a judge interprets the law for a particular case. That's where the inconsistencies come from. Steve B. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message